Archive for October, 2006

Endangered on Woodruff?

Thursday, October 5th, 2006

Yesterday I rambled around west of Flatbush.  On Woodruff Ave, right around the corner from Flatbush on the north side of the street, I was a little surprised to see this builiding.  In general the state of disrepair is usually not so evident in buildings this close to Flatbush.

It appears there are still residents in the building, at least on the ground floor.  Air conditioners are in the windows. Upper floors look really bad, but I think this could be turned into something very nice.  The original decorative glass is still in evidence on the ground floor, in 5 of the six windows.

Property Shark has this as being built in 1931, a tax lein acquisition in August 2002 from the City, it appears to have changed hands January 2006 to Tratt Management & Dev, LLC with David Tepper as party2.  Also it looks to have been an SRO with 43 units on record which is pretty amazing to think about.

Given the state of disrepair this is another building I am worried will be a future teardown.  It would be great to recover this and turn it into eight condos or co-ops — or even rentals. Very sad indeed, it is so disturbing to think what it could be replaced with.

Car Park

Wednesday, October 4th, 2006

I’ve changed my mind and decided to post a pic. I was walking along Clarkson and grabbed this photo of pure ugliness (the parking situation, not the buildings). Honestly, when all we have here is our architecture and the bits of greenery in form of our front yards, this row of buildings screams an affront to any sense of aesthetics. Across the street from this same row of buildings, none of the homeowners are following suit. It must be a major touch of ugliness looking at this every morning from any and all views. Note: among this row, not every building has excavated a parking place. I really wish whatever authorities oversee/approve this kind of use would be more considerate of the overall context of the neighborhood and begin to think about rules that maintain the original sense of the neighborhood. Again I cannot help but wonder if this is even legal, and if so, how did it happen?

I would be in favor of parking permits for each block or area in exchange for the cessation of this kind of makeshift parking.

More Building Notation

Wednesday, October 4th, 2006

I walked by the building I wrote about earlier, on Lincoln Road.  This time I was able to get a better view of it and had not realized there are additional markings on the façade that went unnoticed before.  I had no idea what the “RO” appearing both above and below the condemned symbol means.  If anyone knows, please enlighten me.

Several nice people have written to inform me this means “Roof Open.”  Thanks everyone.

Tulip

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

To your right, listed under “A Few Brooklyn Books” you will see the title Brooklyn by Name, which is on my wish list and perhaps already addresses the topic of this post, I haven’t even looked at the book yet.  Or may be the answer lies in Forgotten New York, another wishlist item I haven’t picked up yet.

In the Brooklyn Eagle, dated 09 Nov 1897, the Council meeting of the Board of Aldermen ordered the following changes in street names:

  • Avenue A to Ausable avenue
  • Avenue B to Beverly [sic] road
  • Avenue E to Ditmas avenue
  • Tulip street to Rutland road
  • Hart’s alley to Mack place
  • Vesta avenue to the Van Sindered avenue
  • Neck road to Kouwenhoven place
  • Bay Sixteenth street to New Utrecht avenue
  • Jackson street to New Utrecht avenue

Interesting changes, I am just curious why Tulip became Rutland.   Some of the reasoning on all of the changes would be interesting, odd that sort of information was not in the paper.

Westbury Court Entry

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

I can’t imagine these are the original colors, but it is interesting anyway and quite strking.  Number 2121 Westbury Court, off of Flatbush Avenue.

Sorting Out Fenimore Street

Monday, October 2nd, 2006

On Fenimore Street, which currently runs east beginning at Flatbush, the numbering of the buildings begins in the 60s. This does not match the numbering of, say, Rutland Road nor that of Hawthorne, parallel streets both north and south of Fenimore.

I have been suspicious of the building numbers since moving here four plus years ago. Almost directly across the intersection of Flatbush and Fenimore is an “alley” (currently providing access to a large parking lot) which could well have been a street at some point, or a part of it at least. I should modify this to read “was” as alley, because as I write, new construction is ongoing.

After spending some time looking at the wonderful resource we have in the Brooklyn Eagle archives online (thank you BPL!) I was able to find some references providing evidence that Fenimore Street once extended all the way to Ocean Avenue. This would certainly account for the missing house numbers.

I’ve reproduced excerpts from three of the references I found.  It appears that in 1880 Fenimore Street was, indeed, intersecting with Ocean Avenue. From the 1897 article, it suggests the proposed extension of Fenimore may have largely been the building of a bridge over the Brighton Beach line (where the Q and B trains now run).  Unfortunately I wasn’t able to find any follow-up information on this in terms of decisions, the online archives end in 1902.  The third source, 1900, shows Fenimore and Ocean continue to intersect.  It is interesting, the resolution will likely be in the form of an afternoon at the Library — unless anyone reading this has the intel.

Source 1: Brooklyn Eagle, 24 Apr 1880, Page 4. A Sheriff’s Sale (public auction of property) ” … that lot or parcel of land, situate on the east side of Ocean avenue in the Town of Flatbush, in the County of Kings and State of New York, bounded and described as follows, viz: Beginning at a point distant three hundred and sixty feet and thirty eight one-hundredths of a foot northerly from the north east corner of Fenimore street and Ocean avenue …”

Source 2: Brooklyn Eagle, 28 Nov 1897, Page 10, Proposed New Streets. “… Another proceeding of considerable interest to many Flatbush people is the opening of Fenimore street from Flatbush to Ocean avenues. This proceeding has ben [sic] before the commissioners [named] for several months. The commissioners filed their reports on the 3d November, 1897, allowing for lands taken $11,016.61, for buildings and improvements $1,601 and a residue lot abandoned but the owner, one Henry C. Ryan, for $1,928.93. This street also crosses the railroad of the Brighton Beach Company, but the latter corporation did not see fit to appear before the commissioners, nor to make any claim for damages either to their land or improvements to be affected by the street opening. The commissioners felt justified in assuming that the railroad company placed no particular value upon an old rickety shed, which encroached upon the line of the improvement and, therefore, awarded the corporation $1; they also failed to make any substantial award on account of the land of the railroad company involved in the proceedings, inasmuch as the street would be simply opened across the land of the railroad and their right to its use would not be affected by the easement of the general public across the railroad tracks. …”

Source 3: Brooklyn Eagle, 15 Aug 1900, Page 14. ” … Sidewalks were ordered built on the east side of Ocean avenue between Flatbush avenue and Lincoln road, in front of lots 4 to 8, inclusive, 12, 13, 14, and 15, block 178; on the east side of Ocean avenue, between Fenimore street and Lincoln road, in front of lots 5 and 11, block 181; on the east side of Ocean avenue, between Fenimore street and Fort Hamilton avenue …” 

Holy Cross Cemetery

Monday, October 2nd, 2006

Yesterday, after the rain stopped, we drove over to Holy Cross Cemetery to have a look.  It is a scant mile from my house to the cemetery gates, and I’ve thought about exploring it a bit, but in the past I have received some general “warnings” about safety issues.  So we drove over.

While Holy Cross is not Green-wood by any means, in terms of size and grandeur, it is nonetheless well cared for, neatly manicured and I actually thought the people working there were way nicer than those I have interacted with at Green-Wood.  I felt perfectly safe wandering about and plan to head back on a weekday before the really cold weather hits.

In the Sunday Times

Sunday, October 1st, 2006

In the past couple of weeks I made mention a few times how many buildings I’ve seen in my recent ramblings about the neighborhood that are (probably) destined for demolition, or have been recently demolished as evidenced by vacant lots.  My concern is the buildings I have seen that are still standing (though marked) are mostly — in my opinion from simple observation only — far from demolition material.

The continuous teardown of historic / period buildings to make way for the shoebox buildings contractors are building — structures that lack style and do not visually fit in the neighborhood has to stop.  Oh, you may not mind it so much now, cause maybe that that is “way over” near New York Avenue, but I guarantee it will eventually have an effect upon the general sense of the greater neighborhood.  I feel contractors/builders have the most to gain in this initiative.

I live in Prospect Lefferts Gardens, but  I walk all over the place – in all directions outside of the historic district.  Trust me when I say this teardown and new contruction is happening all over, and quite close to PLG.  Sure, our little enclave will not effected, but you can be sure we will, over time, see other effects.

Today in the New York Times Metro Section, see “A Town’s Architectural Shift, Chronicled Online,” by Tina Kelley.  This article focuses upon just this issue.